As I begin a new course at Walden University focused on
Distance Learning, I realize that my own definition of the subject has been
quite narrow. This is most likely due to
what I had perceived to be a very limited experience with distance learning as
a whole. Distance learning for me has
recently been the typical virtual classroom provided by platforms like Blackboard
(actually I think all of them have been Blackboard) where every class looks and
feels very familiar. The learning has
often been something I have pursued for professional advancement or to hone my
craft. Although I have found a majority
of my experience with distance learning to be pleasurable, my main focus has
always been the educational value. However, as I research the history and
various explanations of distance learning, I continue to broaden my own
definition. This has lead me to question
if I had not been engaging in distance learning my whole life under the guise
of entertainment and should I dare say… fun!
I remember back to my days
sitting in front of my television and listening to Bill Cosby’s marker squeak
across the screen. I would sit with my
workbook pressed against the coffee table as I mimicked the magic marker’s
movements. I recall learning a lot from
Bill Cosby without once meeting him face to face. Moving into elementary school, I recall my
teachers mailing packets to my home each week to work on over summer
break. I would return them to receive free
pizza coupons and stickers for my hard work.
I was too young and naïve to realize that what I found fun and engaging
was my earliest experiences with distance learning. Michael Potashnik and Joanne Capper point out
the role that distance learning has played in early education by “enhancing the
quality of traditional primary and secondary schooling“ (Potashnik & Capper, 1998) . These experiences helped me to build basic skills
that would be vital to my success as an early learner.
As an
adult, a majority of my distance learning has fallen under its more traditional
definition. The definition adopted by
the Association for Educational Communications and Technology has gained wide
acceptance and outlines four main components (Simonson, Smaldino, & Zvacek, 2012) .
Distance education is
“institution-based, formal education where the learning group is separated, and
where interactive telecommunications systems are used to connect learners,
resources, and instructors” (Simonson, Smaldino, & Zvacek, 2012, p. 32) .
Although there is much emphasis placed on the distance
education being formal and asynchronous, I feel that the idea that this type of
learning must be interactive should not be overlooked. The interaction that takes place between the
learner(s) and instructor is essential to successful distance learning. In depth discussion and thoughtful interaction
that takes place within a distance learning community lead to the educational
growth of the learners.
So as I reflect on my personal
experience with distance learning, I have arrived at my own personal definition. I feel that distance learning is education
provided to learners who are separated from their instructor and other learners
both geographically and in time.
Meaningful communication and educational interactions takes place
asynchronously through the use of technology which is used to facilitate and
support educational growth.
In the future, I see distance
learning growing in popularity. I feel
that enrollment in distance high education will continue to expand as more
colleges and universities provide distance learning options. As Dr. Simonson points out in his video Distance
Education: The Next Generation, I do not believe it will ever replace
traditional face to face learning.
However, I do see public education, as well as face to face high
education courses, moving towards blended learning where components of distance
learning will merge into the classroom setting.
We currently see this in flipped classrooms where teachers provide much
of the learning through the use of technology that is accessed by students from
home. That learning is then brought back
into the class where students are expected to use their new knowledge under the
supervision of their teacher. In conclusion,
distance education is no longer a trend or novelty. We will continue to see distance learning
opportunities in all sectors of education and training as technology continue
to offer new ways to distribute knowledge.
References
Potashnik,
M., & Capper, J. (1998). Finance and development, 42-45.
Simonson, M.,
Smaldino, S., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a
distance: Foundations of distance education. Boston : Pearson.
Laureate Education (Producer). (n.d.). Distance education: The next
generation [Video file]. Retrieved from
https://class.waldenu.edu

That is a constant struggle for me - making sure each online course has some unique quality to it. I realize the need for quality templates, but I do hate the cookie-cutter style that seems to be common. Of course, on one hand, for each Walden course, I know exactly where information is going to be located. However, it gets OLD. I have appreciated the extra announcements and materials offered by both Dr. Porter and Dr. Paige. It helps to set their courses apart.
ReplyDeleteRebecca